. Hon`ble Sudhanshu Dhulia, J. (Oral)1. On a sales contract registered on 14.07.2011, the petitioner created a stamp duty of paragraph 10.000/-. It was finally found. that the amount of stamp duty paid by the petitioner is not sufficient, since the assessment of stamp duty rs. 1.19.000 / – It was therefore found that the stamp was short around rule 1.09.000…/- The additional district judge, Udham Singh Nagar, told the petitioner to pay stamp duty of paragraph 1.09.000 / – with a fine of paragraph 32.700 / -.2. What the petitioner will table. Like Section 43CA &50C of the Act, where the valuation of stamp duty is greater than the contract value, the difference between the value of stamp duty and the contractual value of income tax under the heading “Income from other sources” is debited in the hands of the buyer.
. Rent receipts. The applicant considered that those documents could not be accepted because no stamp duty was deentant. The Procedural Court held that the document was nothing more than a letter containing the conditions and conditions …, after taking into account the competing claims and referring to the declaration annexed to point 5 of the stamp duty on West Bengal instruments, and concluded as follows: “The alleged letter contains one. the documents concerned must not be seized. As this is the purchase agreement, the stamp duty referred to in Annex 1-A, as amended, must be paid. Law and responsibility were created or. On October 31, 2020, a 40-year-old man was arrested by Noida police for defrauding a bank of two Crores Rs., falsifying sales documents and borrowing. On the same day, Madurai Principal Sessions Judge G Ilangovan granted early bail for document registration without prior verification to two sub-registrars arrested by the Dindigul District Crime Branch. According to the police, they registered the deed of sale without checking the certificate of hardship, as well as the original documents, parental documents, death certificate, etc. The purchase agreement was insufficiently stamped, it could be seized and, until payment of an appropriate stamp duty, the complaint could not be taken into consideration? 10. There is none.
Scrupulously observed. 11. In the present case, given that the fact of the performance of the contract of sale is indisputable, I consider that the State Commission committed a serious illegality of non-expropriation. The purchase agreement had not been paid.. . .